Knee dislocations with vascular injuries - a review article.

Knee dislocations are complex and devastating injuries that are potentially limb threatening. A high level of suspicion is required to diagnose and treat these injuries properly and timely because some of the knee dislocations spontaneously reduce, and the seriousness of the injury might not be appreciated early. Early diagnosis of concomitant vascular injuries is imperative to avoid limb loss because the risk of amputation is high when diagnosis and timely intervention are delayed. It is recommended that serial ankle-brachial index (ABI) be performed in all patients with suspected knee dislocation. This is particularly important in fracture dislocations, high-energy trauma, morbidly obese patients, lateral sided injuries, concomitant peroneal nerve injuries and fracture in the ipsilateral limb because these were demonstrated to be associated with a high risk of concomitant vascular injuries in knee dislocations. In cases where serial ABI cannot be performed, in high-risk patients and ABI less-than 0.9, a CT angiography should be performed.

Ayudando a la toma de decisiones en el diagnóstico, tratamiento y seguimiento de úlceras de etiología vascular mediante el empleo de una aplicación móvil / A mobile decision support system for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of vascular ulcers

Introducción y objetivo: los sistemas de ayuda a la decisión médica (SADM) son sistemas computacionales que utilizan dispositivos inteligentes, lo que facilita el diagnóstico y el tratamiento de múltiples patologías, transformando la atención sanitaria en un sistema dinámico y de precisión. Las úlceras de etiología vascular representan un importante problema de salud que suponen un gran consumo de recursos. La transformación digital puede mejorarla calidad de los diagnósticos, de los tratamientos y de los seguimiento de los pacientes, mejorando la eficacia y la eficiencia de la asistencia sanitaria. El objetivo es desarrollar una aplicación móvil que facilite el diagnóstico y el tratamiento de úlceras de etiología vascular. Métodos: para desarrollar este SADM se elaboraron algoritmos para los diagnósticos y los tratamientos capaces de generar una respuesta correcta, guiando al usuario hacia un diagnóstico más probable o a la aplicación del tratamiento específico. En Android se empleó el entorno de programación Android Studio y el lenguaje de programación JAVA, y para el desarrollo en iOS se empleó XCode y el lenguaje de programación Swift. El diagnóstico de úlceras de etiología vascular incluye: úlcera neuropática, isquémica, neuroisquémica, venosa o flebostática, úlceramixta y úlcera hipertensiva o de Martorell. Resultados: UlcerAPP es visual e intuitiva. Orientará en el diagnóstico en respuesta a los algoritmos desarrollados. Además, podrá accederse al tratamiento específico de cada una de ellas. Incluirá recomendaciones de seguimiento y criterios de derivación. Conclusiones: UlcerAPP es un proyecto desarrollado para mejorar el manejo clínico de las úlceras en el entorno de la Atención Primaria y potenciar el conocimiento de la patología vascular y del tratamiento de las úlceras de dicha etiología. (AU)

Introduction and objective: decision support systems (DSS) are computer systems that use computer devicesor smartphones, facilitating the diagnosis and properly treatment of multiple pathologies, transforming healthcare into a dynamic, preventive and precision system. Vascular ulcers represent an important health problem, witha great consumption of resources. Digital transformation can improve the quality of diagnoses, treatments andpatient follow-up, and therefore improve the effectiveness and efficiency of healthcare. This paper aims to develop UlcerApp, a totally new mobile DSS for vascular ulcers management, which facilitates the diagnosis, treatment andmonitoring of ulcers of vascular etiology, in the primary health care. Methods: for achieving the main purpose of this research work, a decision algorithm will be developed and implemented by an Android (Android Studio- JAVA) and iOS (XCode- Switf ) mobile applications. Results: the App developed which implements the algorithms UlcerApp is capable of diagnose 6 kind of vascularulcers: neuropathic, ischemic, neuroischemic, venous ulcer, mixed ulcer and hypertensive or Martorell ulcer. UlcerAPP is a visual and intuitive application that will guide the user to correct diagnosis. After them, users will be able to access the specific treatment. It will include follow-up recommendations as well as referral criteria. Conclusions: UlcerAPP is a project developed to improve the clinical management of vascular ulcers in the primary health care, enhance knowledge of vascular pathology and treatment of ulcers of said etiology. (AU)

Management of Vascular Injuries in Penetrating Trauma.

Management of vascular trauma remains a challenge and traumatic injuries result in significant morbidity and mortality. Vascular trauma can be broadly classified according to mechanism of injury (iatrogenic, blunt, penetrating, and combination injuries). In addition, this can be further classified by anatomical area (neck, thoracic, abdominal, pelvic, and extremities) or contextual circumstances (civilian and military).

Outcomes Following Below Knee Arterial Trauma.

INTRODUCTION: Lower extremity vascular injuries have significant implications for trauma patients with regards to morbidity from limb loss. There is limited evidence on outcomes for patients with injuries to tibial arteries. Our study focuses on defining outcomes of traumatic vascular injury to vessels below the knee. METHODS: A retrospective review using ICD-9 and 10 codes of all patients with below knee vascular injuries was performed at a Level 1 trauma center from November 2014 to June 2022. Interventions, outcomes, and complications were assessed. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients were identified fitting inclusion criteria. The mean age was 35.3 +/- 15.2 years and 67 (88%) patients were male. Thirty-nine suffered penetrating trauma, 37 suffered blunt trauma. The most injured artery was posterior tibial artery (40%) followed by anterior tibial artery (36%). Injuries included 51 transections, 22 occlusions and 4 pseudoaneurysms. Forty-five (59%) patients underwent operative intervention. Thirty (67%) operations were performed by trauma surgery. Arterial ligation was performed in 30 cases (67%), arterial bypass in 12 (27%), and 2 (4%) primary amputations. Vascular surgery performed all bypasses. Overall amputation rate was 8% (n = 6) with 3 for mangled extremity and 3 due to failed bypass graft. All amputations were associated with open fracture and amputations for failed bypass had multiple arterial injuries. CONCLUSION: The management of below knee vascular trauma requires a multidisciplinary approach. Patients requiring reconstruction are more likely to have multiple vessel injuries and may have significant risk of graft failure. These patients as well as those with extensive soft tissue injury and/or multi-vessel injuries are at increased risk for amputation.

Traumatic Popliteal Artery Occlusion Following Lower Extremity Crush Injury Presenting With Isolated Patellar Dislocation.

While traumatic popliteal artery injury historically has a low incidence, failure to acutely recognize the vascular insult poses a significant risk of limb loss and functional impairment. A 71-year-old male presented with left lower extremity pain in setting of a crush injury working underneath a vehicle resulting in an isolated lateral dislocation of his patella and complete occlusion of the distal popliteal artery. He was taken to the operating room for an in-situ bypass and four-compartment fasciotomy. His hospital stay included three staged washouts/debridements with eventual closure. He was discharged after 38 days to a rehabilitation facility with ability to self-ambulate with assistance within one month. This patient's presentation is unique for his isolated patellar dislocation without associated injuries characteristically associated with a traumatic vascular injury of the popliteal artery and serves to remind the importance of complete examination in the setting of blunt trauma.

A Simple Scoring Model for Evaluation of Concomitant Vascular Injuries in Patients with Lower Extremity Open Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Timely diagnosis and management of concomitant vascular injuries is usually needed for the management of lower extremity open fractures. In the current study, a prediction model and simplified scoring system of vascular injuries were developed for the primary evaluation of patients with lower extremity open fractures. METHODS: Patients with lower extremity open fractures were retrospectively reviewed from 2017 to 2020. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate independent risk factors for concomitant vascular injuries in these patients using data collected from 2017 through 2019 and a prediction scoring model was created accordingly. Model performance was validated with data from 2020. RESULTS: In total, 949 patients with lower extremity open fractures (development cohort, 705 patients, 2017 through 2019; validation cohort, 244 patients, 2020) were enrolled. Concomitant vascular injuries occurred in 44 patients in the development cohort (6.2%). Three clinical variables were identified for a prediction scoring model with weighted points, including hard or soft vascular signs (3 points), segmental fractures (2 points), and degloving soft-tissue injury (1 point). The model showed good discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.928), calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test, P = 0.661), and precision (Brier score, 0.041). Subsequent management regarding different aspects (observation only, further imaging study, or direct surgical exploration) can thus be decided. The model also demonstrated good discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.949), good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test, P = 0.174), and good precision (Brier score, 0.042) in the validation cohort. CONCLUSION: This model may guide the subsequent management of vascular injuries associated with lower extremity open fractures. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

Therapeutic management and amputation options in a long time delayed blunt popliteal artery injury.

PURPOSE: To report the experience of treatment on blunt traumatic popliteal artery injury (PAI) combined orthopedic injuries and determine the amputation-associated factors. METHODS: From January 2008 to December 2019, 55 patients in level I trauma center with traumatic blunt PAI were retrospectively reviewed. Variables were retrospectively collected and statistically analyzed. Patients with PAI with limb selvage, primary amputation, and secondary amputation were retrospectively grouped and compared. RESULTS: A total of 55 patients with a median age of 41.4 years (range 18-70), of which 45 were males (81.8%) and 10 were females (18.2%), were enrolled. The overall amputation rate was 36.4% because 88.6% of patients faced more than 6 h of delay before treatment. The average injury severe score (ISS) and abbreviated injury score (AIS) were 10.4 (range 9-34) and 8.2 (range 5-16), respectively. Multivariate regression analysis showed that the number of hospitalization days was a significantly related factor to amputation. After a median follow-up of 56 months (range 12-132), no death, another limb loss, or claudication was found in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PAI are commonly accompanied by multiple injuries that increase the risk of amputation; therefore, timely treatments are urgently required. Reducing the severity of ischemia by fasciotomy, not losing time by performing preoperative imaging or diagnostic tests, and repairing the associated venous injury can help to optimize the rates of limb salvage. However, impact factors, such as the gender and age of the patient, injured mechanisms, concomitant injuries, AIS, ISS, and surgical times, are not associated with the outcomes of amputation. Nonetheless, endeavors to salvage the limbs as far as possible should be made.

Vascular and Neurological Injury in Children With Posterior Traumatic Knee Dislocation.

Posterior knee dislocations (PKD) in children are uncommon but may be associated with vascular injury. The purpose of this study is to characterize the frequency of vascular injury in PKD as well as define patient characteristic, procedures, types of treating hospitals, and clinical outcomes. This study utilized the National Trauma Data Set (NTDS) from the American College of Surgeons on years 2015 and 2016. All demographic and clinical data on pediatric patients (≤18 years) with the ICD codes for PKD were obtained. 44 PKD were identified. The median age was 17 years [IQR 15,18], 70% male; 49% white. The mean body mass index was 29.6 [IQR 23-38]. We found that vascular injury was present in 16 patients (36%); 14 (30%) underwent repair (eight with saphenous vein graft) and fasciotomies in eight patients. Nerve injury was present in five patients (11%). Lower extremity amputation was performed in three patients (7%).

Contemporary Management and Outcomes of Injuries to the Inferior Vena Cava: A Prospective Multicenter Trial From PROspective Observational Vascular Injury Treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Injuries to the inferior vena cava (IVC), while uncommon, have a high mortality despite modern advances. The goal of this study is to describe the diagnosis and management in the largest available prospective data set of vascular injuries across anatomic levels of IVC injury. METHODS: The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma PROspective Observational Vascular Injury Treatment (PROOVIT) registry was queried from November 2013 to January 2019. Demographics, diagnostic modalities, injury patterns, and management strategies were recorded and analyzed. Comparisons between anatomic levels were made using non-parametric Wilcoxon rank-sum statistics. RESULTS: 140 patients from 19 institutions were identified; median age was 30 years old (IQR 23-41), 75% were male, and 62% had penetrating mechanism. The suprarenal IVC group was associated with blunt mechanism (53% vs 32%, P = .02), had lower admission systolic blood pressure, pH, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), and higher ISS and thorax and abdomen AIS than the infrarenal injury group. Injuries were managed with open repair (70%) and ligation (30% overall; infrarenal 37% vs suprarenal 13%, P = .01). Endovascular therapy was used in 2% of cases. Overall mortality was 42% (infrarenal 33% vs suprarenal 66%, P<.001). Among survivors, there was no difference in first 24-hour PRBC transfusion requirement, or hospital or ICU length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Current PROOVIT registry data demonstrate continued use of ligation extending to the suprarenal IVC, limited adoption of endovascular management, and no dramatic increase in overall survival compared to previously published studies. Survival is likely related to IVC injury location and total injury burden.

Blunt Trauma to Brachiocephalic Artery: Presentation and Management.

Isolated innominate artery injury is very rare and accounts for less than 3% of recognized arterial injuries. Surgical exploration of the artery, especially at the origin of the artery from the arch of the aorta, is surgically challenging. Due to its rarity, any 1 surgeon's experience in dealing with innominate artery injury is bound to be limited. We report 2 cases of innominate artery injury post-blunt chest trauma. Both patients underwent thoracotomy and innominate artery Dacron graft repair and both had an uneventful postoperative course.

Validation of the OPEN-CLEAN Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Perforation Score in a Multicenter Registry.

Coronary artery perforation is one of the most common and feared complications of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We evaluated the utility of the recently presented OPEN-CLEAN (Coronary artery bypass graft, Length of occlusion, Ejection fraction, Age, calcificatioN) perforation score in an independent multicenter CTO PCI dataset. Of the 2,270 patients who underwent CTO PCI at 7 centers, 150 (6.6%) suffered coronary artery perforation. Patients with perforations were older (69 ± 10 vs 65 ± 10, p <0.001), more likely to be women (89% vs 82%, p = 0.010), more likely to have history of previous coronary artery bypass graft (38% vs 20%, p <0.001), and unfavorable angiographic characteristics such as blunt stump (64% vs 42%, p <0.001), proximal cap ambiguity (51% vs 33%, p <0.001), and moderate-severe calcification (57% vs 43%, p = 0.001). Technical success was lower in patients with perforations (69% vs 85%, p <0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the OPEN-CLEAN perforation risk model was 0.74 (95% confidence interval 0.68 to 0.79), with good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow p = 0.72). We found that the CTO PCI perforation risk increased with higher OPEN-CLEAN scores: 3.5% (score 0 to 1), 3.1% (score 2), 5.3% (score 3), 7.1% (score 4), 11.5% (score 5), 19.8% (score 6 to 7). In conclusion, given its good performance and ease of preprocedural calculation, the OPEN-CLEAN perforation score appears to be useful for quantifying the perforation risk for patients who underwent CTO PCI.

Peripheral vascular trauma - basic management, diagnosis and treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Peripheral vascular injuries occur in 1-3% of all traumas in civilian settings. The management of these injuries is often based on experience derived from war medicine where these injuries are more common. The goal of this article is to summarize basic guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of vascular injuries. METHODS: Western Trauma Association (WTA) and Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) both have their own guidelines for vascular trauma management. RESULTS: Vascular injuries occur both in penetrating and blunt traumas. Complete vessel disruption occurs more frequently in penetrating traumas. In the case of blunt trauma, intimal defects are more common, resulting in dissection, false aneurysm, or intramural hematoma. The limb is mostly endangered due to ischemia, reperfusion injury and the compartment syndrome. Prompt diagnosis and treatment are paramount. Vascular trauma management is part of the ATLS protocol and life-over-limb principle. The primary goal is to stop the massive external bleeding. Clinical examination and CT angiography are the most helpful for the diagnosis. Surgical revision is indicated when hard signs are present. This can be a damage control surgery with the primary goal to stop the bleeding as quickly as possible. A shunt can be used for temporary reperfusion of the limb. Definitive treatment can take the form of a simple suture, patches or graft interposition; both prosthetic and autologous grafts are used. Sufficient debridement and fasciotomy are important steps in the therapy. In some cases, endovascular treatment can be used. CONCLUSION: Over the last century, the treatment strategy changed dramatically. Data from recent military conflicts show a decrease in amputation rates, and limb salvage has become a standard.

Vascular injuries: Aetiology, presentation and management outcomes at a tertiary hospital in Lagos, Nigeria.

Vascular injuries lead to haemorrhagic shock and distal limb ischaemia, especially with an arterial injury. This life-threatening state mandates urgent evaluation and intervention to save life and limbs. The treatment aims to restore blood flow and replace lost blood within the golden hours, stabilising cardiovascular haemodynamics and averting irreversible ischaemic damage. The aim of this study was to analyse the clinical profile of vascular injuries, management and outcomes in our institution. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study covered the period from January 2015 to December 2021. Information of interest were extracted from the medical records of each participant. The results from the data analysis were presented in charts and tables. Results: Seventy-four patients aged 15-78 years (mean 32.30 ± 13.75 years) were included in this study. The male-to-female ratio was 3.6:1. The most common causes were gunshot injury, road traffic accident and iatrogenic injuries. The mean duration from injury to presentation was 9.85 h and mean duration from presentation to restoration of flow was 7.3 h. The most common injured artery was the femoral artery, whereas the most common vein was inferior vena cava. Primary vascular repair was done in majority of the cases. Amputation was performed in 18.9% with loss of viability of the limb. Conclusion: Vascular injury though relatively uncommon remains a challenging and life-threatening disease predominantly in young adult males. Urgent intervention prevents limb loss and mortality. Favourable outcome is accomplished by improving emergency healthcare delivery and well-equipped vascular centres with adequately trained personnel in the nation's hospitals.

Acute abdominal aortic injury during posterior lumbar fusion surgery: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Vascular injury is a serious complication during lumbar fusion surgery, leading to massive blood loss and life-threatening circulatory failure. In this study, we report on a patient with abdominal aorta injury at L2-L3 level during lumbar fusion surgery via posterior approach. Fortunately, our patient was successfully managed with prompt intervention. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 73-year-old female was admitted to our department of low back and bilateral leg pain with claudication for over 6 months. DIAGNOSIS: L2-S1 spinal canal stenosis, with abdominal aorta injury at the L2-L3 level during lumbar fusion surgery via a posterior approach. INTERVENTIONS: L2-S1 decompression and fusion via a posterior approach was employed for spinal canal stenosis. Transluminal angioplasty with stent placement was successfully performed to stop the bleeding. OUTCOMES: During the procedure, it was decided that staunching the active bleeding was necessary and attention should be paid to the vital signs and blood pressure. Vascular surgical intervention was immediately scheduled when the blood pressure dropped. After stent placement, hemodynamic parameters stabilized. CONCLUSION: In this case report we review the prevalent sites, predisposing risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment of acute abdominal aortic injury during posterior lumbar fusion surgery, in view of our case findings. Although the incidence of vascular injury during lumbar fusion surgery is low, it is often easily overlooked. Consequently, during surgery, physicians should always be alert to the risk of vascular injury and master its clinical characteristics. Once injury is suspected, active and effective measures should promptly be taken for diagnosis and treatment to avoid serious adverse consequences.

Catastrophic Vascular Injury After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Vascular injury is a feared complication of any surgical procedure. This study examined the incidence of vascular injury during total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the circumstances and timing of injury intraoperatively, and acute management. Eighteen cases of catastrophic vascular injury after primary TKA (12 of 19,577; 0.06%) or revision TKA (6 of 4453; 0.1%) were identified. Catastrophic injury was defined as any vascular injury requiring vascular surgery. Chart review was performed to identify the timing of vascular injury, the injured blood vessel, and acute management. The Knee Society Score (KSS) was calculated. Mean follow-up was 8 years. Surgical indications included primary osteoarthritis for 12 cases, reimplantation for infection for 3 cases, and aseptic revision for 3 cases. Vessel injury included the popliteal artery in 10 cases, the popliteal artery and vein in 5 cases, and the popliteal vein in 3 cases. Thirteen injuries occurred during tibial preparation. Management included thrombectomy and reanastomosis in 15 cases and vessel bypass in 3 cases. One patient had thrombosis and limb ischemia 2 days after repair, requiring bypass. No amputations had occurred at late follow-up. Mean KSS was 74 at latest follow-up. Catastrophic vascular injury is more common after revision TKA (1 of 1000) than after primary TKA (6 of 10,000). Most injuries occur during tibial preparation. If identified quickly and addressed promptly by vascular surgery, limb salvage is likely. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(6):340-344.].

Saved by the Clot in Superior Vena Cava Injury.

Penetrating neck injuries (PNIs) can cause injuries to great vessels. Superior vena cava (SVC) injury from a stab to the neck is rare and when it occurs, poses a significant risk of exsanguinating hemorrhage. We report a case of a 17-year female who survived a delayed presentation of five hours after sustaining stab injury to zone 1 of the neck. Her external wound was just above the medial 1/3rd of the clavicle which resulted in SVC laceration. Mechanism and site of injury along with clinical presentation with right hemothorax was highly suspicious for a vascular injury. Exsanguinating hemorrhage was halted by a soft clot in this hypotensive patient. Furthermore, permissive hypotension with judicious resuscitation stabilised the patient enough to undergo a contrast venogram to identify the level of SVC injury. The patient underwent successful surgical repair of SVC. This case illustrates the point that control of bleeding by soft clots does not rule out major vascular injury. Additionally, it demonstrates how permissive hypotension can be helpful as a damage control stepping stone in the management of these critical patients. Key Words: Penetrating neck injury, Permissive hypotension, SVC laceration, Venorrhaphy.

Vascular injury during cholecystectomy: A multicenter critical analysis behind the drama.

BACKGROUND: The management of a vascular injury during cholecystectomy is still very complicated, especially in centers not specialized in complex hepatobiliary surgery. METHODS: This was a multi-institutional retrospective study in patients with vascular injuries during cholecystectomy from 18 centers in 4 countries. The aim of the study was to analyze the management of vascular injuries focusing on referral, time to perform the repair, and different treatments options outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients were included. Twenty-nine patients underwent vascular repair (27.9%), 13 (12.5%) liver resection, and 1 liver transplant as a first treatment. Eighty-four (80.4%) vascular and biliary injuries occurred in nonspecialized centers and 45 (53.6%) were immediately transferred. Intraoperative diagnosed injuries were rare in referred patients (18% vs 84%, P = .001). The patients managed at the hospital where the injury occurred had a higher number of reoperations (64% vs 20%, P ˂ .001). The need for vascular reconstruction was associated with higher mortality (P = .04). Two of the 4 patients transplanted died. CONCLUSION: Vascular lesions during cholecystectomy are a potentially life-threatening complication. Management of referral to specialized centers to perform multiple complex multidisciplinary procedures should be mandatory. Late vascular repair has not shown to be associated with worse results.

Pulse oximetry for the diagnosis of vascular injury following limb trauma.

Prompt diagnosis and intervention are essential for acute limb ischaemia after trauma. Guidelines for diagnosis are changing with new evidence. Pulse oximetry may be a useful adjunct. We aim to assess the value of pulse oximetry and other common tests for diagnosing vascular injury. Electronic medical records of patients with limb injuries were identified. Patient demographics, the mechanism of injury, comorbidities, the results of diagnostic tests or examinations, and the end outcome were extracted. Receiver Operator Characteristics (ROC) curves were used to calculate cut-offs with optimum sensitivity and specificity for pulse oximetry. Performance characteristics to predict vascular injury for all documented tests were calculated and compared. SpO2 values were significantly different in the group with and without vascular disruption (p = 0.034). Using a cut-off of 96% calculated from ROC curve analysis, SpO2 had a sensitivity of 78% and a specificity of 90%. For the other techniques, abnormal pulse oximetry waveform, absent distal pulses, and capillary refill over 2 s were significantly different between the two groups. Abnormal pulse oximetry waveform had the highest specificity (100%) while SpO2 was the most sensitive (78%). We suggest that pulse oximetry is a useful adjunct for patients with limb trauma, an abnormal waveform or SpO2 value below 96% suggests vascular disruption is present. Capillary refill over 2 s and absent distal pulses can also be used; if either are positive, this suggests vascular disruption. No test or examination was shown to be able to exclude vascular injury.

Incidence, Treatment, and Outcomes of Coronary Artery Perforation During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the incidence, treatment and outcomes of perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: Coronary perforation is a potentially life-threatening PCI complication. METHODS: We examined the clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics, management, and outcomes of coronary perforation at a tertiary care institution. RESULTS: Between 2014 and 2019, perforation occurred in 70 of 10,278 PCIs (0.7%). Patient age was 71 ± 12 years, 66% were men, and 30% had prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Among perforation cases, the prevalence of chronic total occlusions was 33%, moderate/severe calcification was 66% and moderate/severe tortuosity was 41%. The frequency of Ellis class 1, 2, and 3 perforations was 14%, 50%, and 36%, respectively. Most (n = 51; 73%) were large vessel perforations, 16 (23%) were distal vessel perforations and 3 (4%) were collateral vessel perforations (1 septal and 2 epicardial). Hypotension occurred in 26%, pericardial effusion in 36% and tamponade in 13%; 47% of perforations did not have clinical consequences. Perforations were most often treated with prolonged balloon inflation (63%), reversal of anticoagulation (39%), and covered stent implantation (33%). Technical and procedural success were 73% and 60%, respectively, and major periprocedural adverse cardiac events occurred in 21% of the patients. Three patients (4%) required emergent CABG surgery and four (6%) died. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary perforation is an infrequent complication of PCI. Most perforations are large vessel perforations and often require further intervention. The incidence of death or emergent cardiac surgery is low.